<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google starts the &#8220;anti-IE6 crusade&#8221;. Let&#8217;s hope it works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sidesofmarch.com/index.php/archive/2009/01/02/google-starts-the-anti-ie6-crusade-lets-hope-it-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sidesofmarch.com/index.php/archive/2009/01/02/google-starts-the-anti-ie6-crusade-lets-hope-it-works/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on life, liberty, and information technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.sidesofmarch.com/index.php/archive/2009/01/02/google-starts-the-anti-ie6-crusade-lets-hope-it-works/#comment-410958</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sidesofmarch.com/index.php/archive/2009/01/02/google-starts-the-anti-ie6-crusade-lets-hope-it-works/#comment-410958</guid>
		<description>&quot;IT admins are dragging their feet in upgrading to something else — they feel it’s a security issue&quot;

Those IT admins should be fired.

Oh, I forgot, you said it was a government job. You can&#039;t fire them. :o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;IT admins are dragging their feet in upgrading to something else — they feel it’s a security issue&#8221;</p>
<p>Those IT admins should be fired.</p>
<p>Oh, I forgot, you said it was a government job. You can&#8217;t fire them. <img src='http://www.sidesofmarch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ztron</title>
		<link>http://www.sidesofmarch.com/index.php/archive/2009/01/02/google-starts-the-anti-ie6-crusade-lets-hope-it-works/#comment-410954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ztron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sidesofmarch.com/index.php/archive/2009/01/02/google-starts-the-anti-ie6-crusade-lets-hope-it-works/#comment-410954</guid>
		<description>Many, many government computers, especially defense-related are stuck with IE6.
IT admins are dragging their feet in upgrading to something else -- they feel it&#039;s a security issue
but what they don&#039;t quite get, at this point, IE6 is one of the most unsecure browsers around.
So that&#039;s definitely contributing to that ridiculous IE6 market share.

I noticed mint.com just dropped support for IE6 -- way to go mint!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many, many government computers, especially defense-related are stuck with IE6.<br />
IT admins are dragging their feet in upgrading to something else &#8212; they feel it&#8217;s a security issue<br />
but what they don&#8217;t quite get, at this point, IE6 is one of the most unsecure browsers around.<br />
So that&#8217;s definitely contributing to that ridiculous IE6 market share.</p>
<p>I noticed mint.com just dropped support for IE6 &#8212; way to go mint!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.sidesofmarch.com/index.php/archive/2009/01/02/google-starts-the-anti-ie6-crusade-lets-hope-it-works/#comment-386820</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sidesofmarch.com/index.php/archive/2009/01/02/google-starts-the-anti-ie6-crusade-lets-hope-it-works/#comment-386820</guid>
		<description>About 11% of CSFBL users use IE6. Interestingly, IE and FF (all versions of both) make up 93% of our users, split almost evenly (IE has a slight edge). I guess we&#039;re ahead of the curve.

I don&#039;t plan on doing extensive testing for IE6 with CSBB. It&#039;ll be IE7+, FF2+, Safari 3+, etc.. At some point, a mobile/&quot;light&quot; UI version will be available with very simple interfaces -- old browser users will be able to use that.

That&#039;s an interesting IE6 approach: Force those users to use a mobile-device optimized interface. That should accelerate the upgrade curve a bit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 11% of CSFBL users use IE6. Interestingly, IE and FF (all versions of both) make up 93% of our users, split almost evenly (IE has a slight edge). I guess we&#8217;re ahead of the curve.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t plan on doing extensive testing for IE6 with CSBB. It&#8217;ll be IE7+, FF2+, Safari 3+, etc.. At some point, a mobile/&#8221;light&#8221; UI version will be available with very simple interfaces &#8212; old browser users will be able to use that.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s an interesting IE6 approach: Force those users to use a mobile-device optimized interface. That should accelerate the upgrade curve a bit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris G.</title>
		<link>http://www.sidesofmarch.com/index.php/archive/2009/01/02/google-starts-the-anti-ie6-crusade-lets-hope-it-works/#comment-386771</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sidesofmarch.com/index.php/archive/2009/01/02/google-starts-the-anti-ie6-crusade-lets-hope-it-works/#comment-386771</guid>
		<description>Might be interesting to look up the CSFBL&#039;s stats and see where we can ditch IE6 compatibility (if possible).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might be interesting to look up the CSFBL&#8217;s stats and see where we can ditch IE6 compatibility (if possible).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

